July 2, 2008
Christological Formula
Posted by Zacharias under religion | Tags: Christ, Eastern Orthodox, Eastern Orthodoxy, Lossky, Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, orthodoxy, Vladimir Lossky |No Comments
I came across this in Vladimir Lossky’s The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church and thought I’d post it here for everyone to think over. It’s complex, but it’s the best definition I’ve heard so far!:
“But while in the Trinity there is one nature in three hypostases, in Christ there are two different natures in the one hypostasis. The hypostatsis includes both natures; it remains one though it becomes the other; ‘the Word became flesh’; but deity did not become humanity, nor was humanity transformed into deity. Such is the meaning of the Christological dogma formulated by the Council of Chalcedon:
In conformity with the tradition of the Fathers, we unanimously proclaim that we should confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, perfect in deity and perfect in humanity, true God and true man, composed of a reasonable soul and body, being consubstantial with the Father before all worlds in His deity, born in these last times of Mary the Virgin, Mother of God, in His humanity, for us and for our salvation; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only-Begotten, who was made known in two natures without being mingled, without change, indivisibly, inseparably, in such a way that the union does not destroy the difference of the two natures, but on the contrary the properties of each nature only remain the more firm since they are found united in the one person or hypostasis which is neither separated nor divided into two persons, being the one and the same person of the Son, only- Begotten, God and Word, Lord Jesus Christ.
What strikes one about this formula is its apophatic character; in fact the union of the two natures in one person, but the ‘how’ of this union remains for us a mystery…”

